British lawmakers will vote on whether Prime Minister Keir Starmer should face a parliamentary investigation over the Peter Mandelson controversy, House of Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle announced on Monday.
Members of Parliament will debate on Tuesday whether Starmer should be referred to a committee to determine if he misled parliament over the appointment of Mandelson, a former associate of the late convicted US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as Britain’s ambassador to the United States.
The issue marks the latest twist in a scandal that has dogged Starmer’s government for months and triggered calls for his resignation.
Hoyle said the decision followed requests from several lawmakers, including Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch.
Badenoch has accused Starmer of misleading MPs by insisting proper procedures were followed before Mandelson’s 2024 appointment, despite claims that he had failed security vetting checks.

Starmer has since dismissed the most senior civil servant at the foreign ministry for allegedly failing to inform ministers that Mandelson had not passed the vetting process.
He has also denied accusations that his office pressured officials to approve the appointment.
The prime minister commands a sizeable Labour majority in the House of Commons, meaning support from a significant number of ruling party MPs would be needed for any formal inquiry to proceed.
Speaking to Sky News on Monday night, Starmer dismissed the move as a political stunt.
He said extensive transparency measures were already in place.
The Privileges Committee previously handled the case that led to former prime minister Boris Johnson’s departure from frontline politics after investigating whether he misled parliament over the Covid-era partygate scandal.
Johnson resigned as an MP in 2023 before the committee released a report recommending his suspension.
Starmer removed Mandelson from office in September 2025 after fresh allegations concerning his relationship with Epstein surfaced.
UK police are also investigating Mandelson over claims he committed misconduct in public office while serving as a Labour minister more than a decade ago by allegedly leaking information to the disgraced financier.
Trending 